Mrs Alexandra Kearney1,2, Ms Rachael Gibson3
1Deakin University, Geelong, Australia, 2The Royal Melbourne Hospital Mental Health Services, Parkville, Australia, 3Northern Health, Epping, Australia
Biography:
Alex Kearney is an Occupational Therapist and Lecturer at Deakin University. Alex is passionate about the role of OT in mental health and has over 10 years of public mental health experience. Alex was lead researcher in this project while in her role as Chief Occupational Therapist for The Royal Melbourne Hospital Mental Health Services. Alex has a keen interest in the use of sensory approaches in mental health, has worked in various mental health settings practicing this approach and would like to expand on research and knowledge translation in this area of practice.
Abstract:
This presentation introduces our project, and the cooperative inquiry process used to explore research-related practices and culture within an existing Community of Practice (CoP) in a mental health setting.
Our project originated within an established sensory modulation CoP of occupational therapists working in mental health. A CoP serves as a collaborative space for professional development; however, we identified a gap in engagement with research and evaluation of sensory modulation interventions. Addressing this gap was critical, as sensory interventions are widely used in mental health, yet further research is needed to ensure safe and optimal outcomes. Clinicians using these interventions are well-placed to lead and participate in research but require support to engage in research-related activities.
We explored how research-related practices could be embedded within our CoP. Key questions included: What are the research priorities of the group? What barriers and facilitators influence research-related practices? What support is required to sustain research engagement? A cooperative inquiry process guided this exploration.
The process revealed that clinicians are clear on the "what" in terms of research priorities but not the "how" of implementing evaluation and research practices. Thematic analysis identified barriers such as the tension between evidence and practice, evaluation timing, and the complexity of evaluating individualised interventions. Facilitators included leadership, clear direction, and demonstrating the tangible benefits of evaluation. Key takeaways emphasize the need for sustained leadership and structured support within the CoP to foster a research culture. Ultimately, this project highlights the potential of cooperative inquiry to engage clinicians in research.